在雅思寫(xiě)作中，一切的寫(xiě)作技巧都不如對(duì)寫(xiě)作的細(xì)節(jié)把握。在平時(shí)的寫(xiě)作練習(xí)中，考生可以根據(jù)雅思寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)衡量自己的寫(xiě)作水平，下面是出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)小編搜集整理的關(guān)于雅思作文的寫(xiě)作技巧，歡迎查閱。
    雅思作文寫(xiě)作技巧
    一.拒絕無(wú)謂的單詞和詞組
    1.一些不必要的單詞或詞組根本不能為句子帶來(lái)任何相關(guān)的或重要的信息，完全可以被刪掉。
    比如：When all things are considered， young adults of today live more satisfying lives than those of their parents， in my opinion。
    這句話(huà)當(dāng)中的“when all things are considered”和“in my opinion“都顯得多余。完全可以去掉。改為：
    Young adults of today live more satisfying lives than their parents。
    2.替換無(wú)聊的表達(dá)，故意寫(xiě)出復(fù)雜的長(zhǎng)難句，但是讓整個(gè)句子顯得特別冗長(zhǎng)，其實(shí)并不會(huì)給你的雅思作文加分。
    例如：Due to the fact that our grandparents were under an obligation to help their parents， they did not have the options that young people have at this point in time。
    “due to the fact that”就是一個(gè)很典型的繁瑣的表達(dá)方式的例子，可以替換，簡(jiǎn)化為下面的表達(dá)方式：
    Because our grandparents were obligated to help their parents， they did not have the options that young people have now.
    二.拒絕重復(fù)詞匯和表達(dá)
    1.雅思寫(xiě)作評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中有一點(diǎn)：豐富性。很多考生做不到在寫(xiě)作中使用更豐富的詞匯和表達(dá)，也就與高分失之交臂。有的時(shí)候雖然詞匯沒(méi)有重復(fù)，但意思卻有重復(fù)。這時(shí)候可以做一些簡(jiǎn)化的工作。
    例如下面這個(gè)例子：The farm my grandfather grew up on was large in size。
    large對(duì)一個(gè)farm來(lái)說(shuō)就是size方面的large，所以in size可以去掉，改為：
    The farm my grandfather grew up on was large。
    更簡(jiǎn)潔的表達(dá)方式為：
    My grandfather grew up on a large farm。
    2.有時(shí)一個(gè)詞組可以用一個(gè)更簡(jiǎn)單的單詞來(lái)替換
    例如：My grandfather has said over and over again that he had to work on his parents＇ farm。
    這里的over and over again就可以改為repeatedly，顯得更為簡(jiǎn)潔：
    My grandfather has said repeatedly that he had to work on his parents＇ farm.
    雅思寫(xiě)作備考誤區(qū)
    1.背大學(xué)四六級(jí)詞匯就能順利通過(guò)雅思寫(xiě)作考試
    相當(dāng)多數(shù)量的同學(xué)聽(tīng)說(shuō)只要花時(shí)間把大學(xué)四六級(jí)的單詞全部背熟就能參加雅思寫(xiě)作考試。
    其實(shí)，大學(xué)四六級(jí)英語(yǔ)考試和雅思考試完全是2種不同的英文測(cè)試系統(tǒng)，兩者沒(méi)有內(nèi)在聯(lián)系，應(yīng)試方法也大相徑庭。
    所以同學(xué)們花大精力在背誦和記憶大學(xué)四六級(jí)詞匯無(wú)疑是浪費(fèi)時(shí)間和青春的一種行為。
    針對(duì)這一誤區(qū)，建議考生多閱讀國(guó)外學(xué)術(shù)類(lèi)報(bào)告，積累詞匯和慣用句型，或者看劍橋雅思系列真題集4-10，里面的閱讀文章包括附錄中考官給出的高分范文中的詞匯都是雅思寫(xiě)作考試的重要詞匯。
    此外，有時(shí)間的同學(xué)可以參加專(zhuān)業(yè)和系統(tǒng)的雅思考前培訓(xùn)，在較短的時(shí)間內(nèi)，老師會(huì)教會(huì)你們?nèi)绾握_科學(xué)并高效地準(zhǔn)備雅思考試。
    2.裸考雅思，以考代替復(fù)習(xí)
    盡管雅思考試并不像高考那樣一考定終生，每年有40多場(chǎng)雅思考試可以參加。但是毫無(wú)準(zhǔn)備的去參加考試本身是一種不成熟和對(duì)自己不負(fù)責(zé)，對(duì)父母血汗錢(qián)的一種褻瀆。
    因此建議同學(xué)們必須經(jīng)過(guò)系統(tǒng)培訓(xùn)或者自學(xué)后，有一定的準(zhǔn)備和把握了再去參加考試，以期順利通過(guò)。
    3.反復(fù)做劍橋真題系列，就能得到寫(xiě)作高分
    劍橋真題系列是一套非常經(jīng)典和權(quán)威的雅思應(yīng)考資料，可以這么說(shuō)，所有準(zhǔn)備參加雅思考試的考生基本人手都有一套劍橋的教材。
    正確的做法是要仔細(xì)閱讀劍橋附錄中考官所寫(xiě)的范文，推敲其段落布局，詞匯句型，培養(yǎng)思路和語(yǔ)感。
    雅思作文寫(xiě)作例題
    大作文題目：
    Some people think that the detailed description of crimes on newspapers and TV has bad consequences， so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree？
    話(huà)題分類(lèi)：媒體類(lèi)
    1.題目解析：
    題目大意：一些人認(rèn)為報(bào)紙和電視上對(duì)于犯罪行為的細(xì)節(jié)描述有負(fù)面的影響，因此這樣的信息在媒體中應(yīng)該被限制。在何種程度上同意這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)？
    題型特點(diǎn)：需明確表明對(duì)觀點(diǎn)的態(tài)度；同時(shí)，題目中有一部分信息是觀點(diǎn)的原因，‘對(duì)犯罪行為的細(xì)節(jié)描述有負(fù)面影響’，對(duì)這部分信息不能忽略了回應(yīng)，可以跟主體段證明應(yīng)該被限制放在一起回應(yīng)。
    本文論文推進(jìn)：開(kāi)頭引出當(dāng)下關(guān)于媒體的爭(zhēng)議，以及題目中的觀點(diǎn)，表明自己立場(chǎng)。中間段先分析為何此類(lèi)信息需要被限制，接著用讓步的方式承認(rèn)一些媒體上此類(lèi)信息有一定好處，但過(guò)于細(xì)節(jié)的是需要限制的。結(jié)尾總結(jié)論點(diǎn)，重申觀點(diǎn)。
    難點(diǎn)：這道題容易讓考生糾結(jié)限制的‘程度’問(wèn)題，建議同學(xué)們針對(duì)題目給出的關(guān)鍵信息‘detailed description’進(jìn)行回應(yīng)，即我們的觀點(diǎn)是‘限制媒體上對(duì)于犯罪細(xì)節(jié)的描述’，而不是完全不對(duì)犯罪信息進(jìn)行報(bào)道。
    2.寫(xiě)作思路：
    開(kāi)頭段：當(dāng)下媒體自由度較高，對(duì)犯罪的報(bào)道也越來(lái)越豐富。有人擔(dān)心此類(lèi)細(xì)節(jié)的報(bào)道會(huì)產(chǎn)生不良后果，應(yīng)該被限制。個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)表示同意。
    主體第一段：之所以應(yīng)該限制這一類(lèi)細(xì)節(jié)描述，有幾大原因。受到最大影響的是犯罪的受害者，報(bào)道過(guò)于細(xì)節(jié)，會(huì)加重他們的身心創(chuàng)傷，甚至侵犯隱私。而對(duì)普通大眾來(lái)說(shuō)也無(wú)益，細(xì)節(jié)描述含有過(guò)于血腥暴力的內(nèi)容，不僅引起不適，也讓人擔(dān)憂(yōu)對(duì)年輕人的影響。三是對(duì)于一些潛在的犯罪份子，這些細(xì)節(jié)報(bào)道可能會(huì)給他們提供信息支持，刺激和慫恿了犯罪行為。
    主體第二段：當(dāng)然，適度的報(bào)道有正向作用，也有人認(rèn)為在報(bào)紙和電視上對(duì)犯罪進(jìn)行一定程度的報(bào)道能夠讓大眾增強(qiáng)安全意識(shí)，了解犯罪份子的行為模式，改善保護(hù)措施，避免成為受害者。但報(bào)道的內(nèi)容應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行充分審查，進(jìn)行關(guān)鍵的說(shuō)明即可，細(xì)節(jié)的報(bào)道是沒(méi)有必要的。
    結(jié)尾段：總的來(lái)說(shuō)，基于對(duì)群眾和犯罪率的影響，犯罪的細(xì)節(jié)描述是需要受到審查和限制的， 雖然報(bào)紙和電視有協(xié)助大眾提高防范意識(shí)的責(zé)任。
    參考范文
    Increased degree of freedom in media reports has allowed exposure of crime cases to come forth in a detailed manner， which certainly arouses a great deal of concern. In light of this， some people believe there should be restrictions on such information. From my perspective， I agree that censorship should be imposed on the descriptions of crime.
    There are several reasons why the focus of newspapers and television on high-profile crimes should be more carefully regulated. The group most affected by the news media＇s coverage of violence and victimization is crime victims. This is because media coverage that is sometimes viewed as insensitive， voyeuristic， and uncaring can largely violate victims’ privacy and inflict their emotional and psychological suffering. Not only that， the general public seldom benefits from this exposure to crime details. In fact， these descriptions can not only cause discomfort but also arouse apprehension about the impacts on young people. Besides， it is likely that potential offenders would be instigated and incited to commit crimes， since they might regard detailed media coverage as a form of guidance.
    It is undeniable that the coverage of crime cases can be helpful and， in some cases， even healing. Some would also suggest that the media have the obligation to keep the public well informed about trends in crime. Indeed， the media play a significant role in public safety by keeping citizens apprised of essential information on criminal affairs， such as new patterns of fraud， ways to assist victims and measures to prevent crime. However， the extent to which the media can cover about these cases should be censored carefully by avoiding excessively detailed descriptions， so that they can accurately cover crime stories with the least amount of trauma to the victim and negative repercussions on the public.
    In conclusion， although newspapers and television need to raise the public awareness of key information on crime cases， I contend that restrictions should be imposed on excessive descriptions of details， in order to mitigate the detrimental consequences.