為了幫助廣大考生更好的復(fù)習(xí)，幫考網(wǎng)綜合整理提供了2011GRE考試:issue寫作實例之意見同與不同，以供各位考生復(fù)習(xí)參考，希望對考生復(fù)習(xí)有所幫助。
issue題目：
We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
通常，我們從與我們意見相同的人身上學(xué)到的要比從那些與我們意見相悖的人身上學(xué)的東西要多得多;（因為）意見不統(tǒng)一會帶來壓力并且阻礙學(xué)習(xí)。
正文：
From people whose views we share we get confidence， encouragement， and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles， fresh perspectives， and pertinent advices. But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning. Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides. And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.
Views and ideas from people agree with us may raise our confidence， strengthen our courage， and enhance our psychological satisfaction. According to common sense and our everyday experience， the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings， for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others. Imagine， what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even a glance？ You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning.
On the contrary， agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented， thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more. Moreover， customarily， we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents， friends， classmates and so forth， who are in the same group of ours. By this way we form knowledge of our own. Not under all circumstances we can learn from people whose views we share. Only base on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere， however， could we learn useful knowledge from them. On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning， our learning would be hindered instead of motivated. We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision. Consequently， we can see that the speaker’s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified.
issue題目：
We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
通常，我們從與我們意見相同的人身上學(xué)到的要比從那些與我們意見相悖的人身上學(xué)的東西要多得多;（因為）意見不統(tǒng)一會帶來壓力并且阻礙學(xué)習(xí)。
正文：
From people whose views we share we get confidence， encouragement， and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles， fresh perspectives， and pertinent advices. But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning. Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides. And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.
Views and ideas from people agree with us may raise our confidence， strengthen our courage， and enhance our psychological satisfaction. According to common sense and our everyday experience， the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings， for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others. Imagine， what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even a glance？ You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning.
On the contrary， agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented， thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more. Moreover， customarily， we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents， friends， classmates and so forth， who are in the same group of ours. By this way we form knowledge of our own. Not under all circumstances we can learn from people whose views we share. Only base on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere， however， could we learn useful knowledge from them. On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning， our learning would be hindered instead of motivated. We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision. Consequently， we can see that the speaker’s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified.