成功的花兒，其間浸透了奮斗的淚水和汗水。然而，用淚水和汗水就可以實(shí)現(xiàn)一切的美好。整理了“GRE寫作范文學(xué)習(xí)：學(xué)科細(xì)化”，歡迎閱讀參考！更多相關(guān)訊息請(qǐng)關(guān)注！
GRE寫作題目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that
scholars‘ ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider
audience， their ideas will have little use.”
近些年來(lái)，學(xué)科已經(jīng)細(xì)化到了相當(dāng)?shù)某潭纫灾劣趯W(xué)者們的理念只影響小范圍的人群。除非學(xué)者們能擁有影響等大范圍的人群，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無(wú)用處。
GRE寫作范文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，
scholars’ ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the
knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings‘ knowledge
structure that makes it possible for a scholar’s ideas in his specialized
discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don‘t necessarily belong to his
own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the
process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries， the social economy has been greatly boosted by
the revolutions in science and technology， which in turn increases the width and
depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems
arising in the new situations. To solve new problems， we probably need new
methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas， which will
certainly adds to human beings’ knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and
technology， more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new
problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem
will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the
old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn‘t properly
belong to any sort of the old system， it means a new discipline will emerge. But
could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn’t possess any
relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new
knowledge is obtained through the old methods， which obviously means the new
knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines， otherwise I am
quite sure we could not find it!
From the above， we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic
discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of
human‘s knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural
trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge， it causes humans
to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person
a limited time and energy， it is necessary for a person， who wants to make
progress in his discipline， to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his
research domain， that is to say， to be more devoted to his own research area. On
the other hand， if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area， he will
probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply
put， we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in
the mean time composes symphony like Mozart’s! So we can say every scholar must
be more devoted to his own discipline than to others， but a wider knowledge of
other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
The structure of human knowledge is just like the complexity of a net，
which means various disciplines have interconnections and a progress in one will
undoubtedly bring changes to some others， which is because scholars belonging to
related areas will probably get useful implication from progress happened in
this one. And with this similar process going further， innovations may occur in
several other disciplines， which will even bring forth new disciplines. It is
obvious that scholars‘ ideas can reach a wide audience by the advantage of the
knowledge structure without necessarily reaching wider audiences directly.
GRE寫作題目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that
scholars‘ ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider
audience， their ideas will have little use.”
近些年來(lái)，學(xué)科已經(jīng)細(xì)化到了相當(dāng)?shù)某潭纫灾劣趯W(xué)者們的理念只影響小范圍的人群。除非學(xué)者們能擁有影響等大范圍的人群，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無(wú)用處。
GRE寫作范文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，
scholars’ ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the
knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings‘ knowledge
structure that makes it possible for a scholar’s ideas in his specialized
discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don‘t necessarily belong to his
own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the
process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries， the social economy has been greatly boosted by
the revolutions in science and technology， which in turn increases the width and
depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems
arising in the new situations. To solve new problems， we probably need new
methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas， which will
certainly adds to human beings’ knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and
technology， more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new
problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem
will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the
old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn‘t properly
belong to any sort of the old system， it means a new discipline will emerge. But
could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn’t possess any
relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new
knowledge is obtained through the old methods， which obviously means the new
knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines， otherwise I am
quite sure we could not find it!
From the above， we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic
discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of
human‘s knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural
trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge， it causes humans
to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person
a limited time and energy， it is necessary for a person， who wants to make
progress in his discipline， to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his
research domain， that is to say， to be more devoted to his own research area. On
the other hand， if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area， he will
probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply
put， we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in
the mean time composes symphony like Mozart’s! So we can say every scholar must
be more devoted to his own discipline than to others， but a wider knowledge of
other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
The structure of human knowledge is just like the complexity of a net，
which means various disciplines have interconnections and a progress in one will
undoubtedly bring changes to some others， which is because scholars belonging to
related areas will probably get useful implication from progress happened in
this one. And with this similar process going further， innovations may occur in
several other disciplines， which will even bring forth new disciplines. It is
obvious that scholars‘ ideas can reach a wide audience by the advantage of the
knowledge structure without necessarily reaching wider audiences directly.